Animal Minds and Our Favorite Fables with Dr. Jo Wimpenny

Zazie and Kristi are joined by zoologist Dr. Jo Wimpenny to speak about her ebook, Aesop’s Animals: The Science Behind the Fables.

By Zazie Todd PhD

Watch episode 15 of The Pawsitive Publish in Dialog beneath or on Youtube, pay attention beneath or by way of your favorite podcast app (together with Apple, Spotify), or scroll right down to learn the highlights.

About this episode

This web page incorporates affiliate hyperlinks which suggests I’ll earn a fee on qualifying purchases for free of charge to you.

On this episode of The Pawsitive Publish in Dialog, Zazie and Kristi are joined by zoologist and author Dr. Jo Wimpenny to speak about her ebook Aesop’s Animals: The Science Behind the Fables. We discuss concerning the historical past of Aesop’s fables and the position they nonetheless play in society at present, earlier than shifting on to wonder if there’s a grain of reality in them in terms of animal behaviour.

We contemplate a few of the hottest fables. Are crows actually as intelligent as Aesop steered? Why are wolves at all times the villain? Do canines acknowledge their shadow? And what’s the yellow snow check all about?

We additionally discuss concerning the distinction between what the fable says on the floor, and what occurs while you actually dig deep into the query—the ant and the grasshopper is the fable that involves thoughts right here.

In Wimpenny’s ebook, the animals are the characters in their very own tales. We discuss writing about animals and the significance of discussing myths.

And, after all, we discuss concerning the books we’re studying. This episode, we advocate:

Bitch: On the Feminine of the Species by Lucy Cooke.

Venomous Lumpsucker by Ned Beauman.

Surfacing by Kathleen Jamie.

Being Mortal: Medication and What Issues within the Finish by Atul Gawande.

Earlier than and After the E-book Deal: A Author’s Information to Ending, Publishing, Selling, and Surviving Your First E-book by Courtney Maum.

About Dr. Jo Wimpenny:

Dr. Jo Wimpenny is a zoologist and author, with a analysis background in animal behaviour and the historical past of science. She studied Zoology on the College of Bristol, and went on to analysis problem-solving in crows for her DPhil at Oxford College. After postdoctoral analysis on the historical past of ornithology at Sheffield, she co-authored the ebook Ten Thousand Birds: Ornithology Since Darwin with Tim Birkhead and Bob Montgomerie, which gained the 2015 PROSE award for Historical past of Science, Medication and Know-how. And he or she’s the creator of the great ebook, Aesop’s Animals: The Science Behind the Fables, which is out now in paperback.

Observe Dr. Jo Wimpenny:

Substack   Twitter   Instagram  

Aesop’s Animals is out there from all good bookstores and my Amazon retailer.  

Highlights of the episode with Dr. Jo Wimpenny

Z: How did you give you the concept to match Aesops fables with what we learn about animals? 

J: Yeah in order you mentioned, I did my PhD on crow cognition, that was at Oxford. And it was quickly after I completed that that this pivotal research was revealed on rooks, which was the primary replication of an Aesop Fable. It was the Fable of the Crow and the Pitcher, which I can simply develop barely. I am certain your listeners are acquainted, however there is a very thirsty crow that comes throughout a pitcher with water in it, however it may possibly’t attain the water as a result of it may possibly’t get its head contained in the neck of the pitcher. So what it does is it drops stones into the pitcher, and little by little it brings up the water degree and so it may possibly drink. So it saves itself from dying of thirst by this wonderful downside fixing feat. 

And so this experiment was replicated in I believe 2009 on the College of Cambridge and so they did it with rooks, that are one other form of corvid, so a member of the crow household. And so they discovered that the rooks did it. I would just come out of my PhD and I used to be fairly struck by this experiment, and it wasn’t fast however it sowed the seeds for this concept of, I’m wondering which different fables may really be supported by science? And so the concept was form of born out of that. 

“What can we even imply by the phrase villain once we apply it to animals as a result of that is a really human phrase.”

It was a little bit of a gradual burner however you already know I spent years worrying that any person else was was gonna write all about it earlier than I form of obtained my arse in gear and really did it. 

Z: Effectively fortunately they did not and you bought to do it. And these are very outdated fables aren’t they? They’re from such a very long time in the past, so to consider them now by way of trendy science is a very attention-grabbing concept. However as a result of they’re a part of our cultural historical past, did you develop up with a replica of Aesop’s fables? 

J: You already know I do not even bear in mind. I would love for it to be the case that I fondly bear in mind listening to my mother and father studying Aesop’s fables. I used to be undoubtedly aware of them. I am certain we most likely had a replica. And but what you say about them being actually outdated tales, you already know they date again, nicely we do not know that a lot about Aesop however the present concept is that he lived some 5 to 6 hundred years BC. So if he produced these fables, and we all know that a number of of them may have been added to and so they’ve form of developed over time, however we’re nonetheless over 2,000 12 months outdated tales. 

And the factor that struck me was simply how wonderful, how weird really, it’s that we nonetheless inform these tales which can be so outdated. And that our beliefs about sure animals are nonetheless influenced by these tales; you already know we have moved on in so some ways in our society however this stuff nonetheless affect us from such an early age. And in order that was one among my primary motivations and issues that I wished to discover within the ebook. 

Ok: I believe it is such an excellent hook too, as a result of all people is uncovered to those tales you actually know them. I believe your level was actually good within the ebook that these aren’t tales about animals per se, they’re tales about instructing about human morality, and human society and human habits and the way people ought to act you already know. However as a result of it is animals it turns into prefer it is part of our story. The material of how we take into consideration animals was form of arrange in these tales, so it is actually neat. I assumed it was an excellent hook to be like okay nicely, I did not understand that I assumed that method about animals due to this story that I heard. 

We did not have a replica in my home once I was a child however I believe we learn them in grade 5 or one thing. I bear in mind checking them out of the library and studying them and discovering them actually satisfying, there’s one thing so satisfying about these tales. I believe your writing is also nice. I believe you do a very good job of taking the science and making it attention-grabbing however not dumbed down. I do not suppose the ebook would have had it the legs it has with out your writing in addition to the hook of simply being like Oh God these tales are so acquainted to us. 

J: Oh thanks. I imply that is precisely what I wished to attain actually. It is tales about science, and science needed to be on the coronary heart of them. I did not wish to trivialize what we all know as a result of a few of science is so sophisticated. So there’s loads in that ebook. There are plenty of findings and that is a outstanding testimony actually to the best way that the sphere of animal cognition and every little thing that we learn about animal habits has actually grown. However it’s nice to listen to that you just like my writing type that is good, thanks. 

Ok: So in one of many chapters, The Canine and Its Shadow, it takes the start line of the query of whether or not canines can acknowledge themselves in a mirror. And in addition to answering this query you have a look at what a canine centered strategy to addressing this query may be. Are you able to discuss us by means of that? 

J: Certain. So within the fable there is a canine. It is obtained this beautiful juicy bone, and it is hurrying residence, and it goes throughout a bridge over a river or a lake or one thing, and it sees its reflection. And within the fable it would not acknowledge that the reflection is itself. It sees one other canine. And so it does what canines do and it barks on the different canine, and subsequently drops his bone into the water and loses it. 

And so I noticed this as a very nice method of entering into the subject of self-awareness and mirror self-recognition, and that is a subject that has some controversy to it. Classically the best way that individuals would ask whether or not animals are self-aware, or whether or not they can understand that they are themselves somewhat than the animal, could be to make use of the mirror check. The mirror self-recognition check was pioneered by Gordon Gallup with chimpanzees again within the early Nineteen Seventies. And that check has form of grow to be very a lot the gold customary check for asking whether or not animals are self-aware. 

“I’m wondering which different fables may really be supported by science?”

However for issues like canines and plenty of different animals they do not move it. So in that respect Aesop was fairly proper within the fable in that, and you’ll see this from YouTube I am certain, and I am certain a lot of your listeners may have seen this of their canines as nicely, that in the event that they stand in entrance of a mirror they’re extra prone to bark on the reflection, or they’re extra prone to try to provoke play with it, or perhaps they’re going to simply ignore it. There isn’t any proof that they give the impression of being within the mirror and say, oh that is me and I must get this factor off my face or no matter it’s. 

And so the basic interpretation of animals that fail that check is that they are not self-aware, however fairly lots of people have known as that interpretation into query. So I mentioned it is maybe not as black and white as that, and somewhat than saying we are able to solely get details about self- consciousness from animals that move it, we have to actually be asking what does it imply if animals do not move it? Can we actually say that which means they have no self consciousness? 

It was individuals like Mark Bekoff and Alexandra Horowitz who pioneered these research with canines taking a really totally different strategy. And so they thought it made much more sense to ask what the canine is aware of by means of its sense of odor, as a result of sense of odor is so crucial to canines. And a lot of their form of recognition is finished by means of their nostril somewhat than by means of their eyes that ecologically it is sensible that they may really acknowledge different animals and acknowledge themselves by means of what they’re smelling. In order that they pioneered these checks. 

Mark Bekoff initially did a check known as the yellow snow check. And he simply form of tried this out together with his personal canine. He observed that when he was out strolling within the snow together with his canine, if he moved his canine’s urine additional down the trail whereas his canine was off within the bushes sniffing round, the canine would come again and really take note of that patch of urine. And if he moved the urine of different canines as nicely he may see these variations in the best way that it was sniffing at its urine versus others. After which Alexandra Horowitz took this into the lab and did extra experiments on asking whether or not canines have this olfactory sense of self. The proof appears to be that sure, they may nicely acknowledge themselves based mostly on what they’re smelling somewhat than what they’re seeing in a mirror. 

Z: I believe that is very cool. So is there a fable that obtained issues fully mistaken in terms of animals? 

J: I might say the wolf, however I might say each story just about that we ever hear about wolves is just about mistaken. I imply individuals are actually beginning to write tales which painting wolves fairly properly I believe, however you already know the basic Large Unhealthy Wolf, The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothes. So that’s the Aesop’s fable, The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothes. However there have been a lot of Aesop’s fables about wolves and in each single one just about the wolf is portrayed as this ruthless, misleading vicious killer, usually alone, an animal which plots to do nasty issues. And that is the portrayal I believe that has been continued over the generations and been laid down into our youngsters’s tales and issues like Little Purple Using Hood or Peter and the Wolf or Three Little Pigs. You already know there are such a lot of kids’s tales that painting wolves as these massive unhealthy villains and it is simply not true. 

One in all my primary objections to that’s what we are able to even imply by the phrase villain once we apply it to animals as a result of that is a really human phrase. And naturally these fables have been about conveying human morality and so a lot of these portrayals are tied up in very human language. However a wolf is not a villain, as a result of that is a label that brings with it heaps and plenty of human baggage I believe. And it is the identical for one thing just like the fox, if we name it a trickster or crafty or any of this stuff which form of implies that they are doing issues on this nasty method and so they’re plotting to deceive us. So I used to be very completely happy to try to shoot down that fantasy, expose and painting a few of the true traits of wolves in that exact chapter.

In regards to the co-hosts

Kristi Benson is an honours
graduate of the distinguished Academy for Canine Trainers, the place she earned
her Certificates in Coaching and Counseling (CTC). She additionally has gained
her PCBC-A credential from the Pet Skilled Accreditation Board. She
has lately moved to stunning northern British Columbia, the place she
will proceed to assist canine guardians by means of on-line instructing and
consultations. Kristi is on workers on the Academy for Canine Trainers,
serving to to form the subsequent era of canine professionals. Kristi’s
canines are rescue sled canines, principally retired and completely having fun with a very good
snooze in entrance of the woodstove. 

Kristi Benson’s web site  Fb  Twitter  

Zazie Todd, PhD,
is the award-winning creator of Wag: The Science of Making Your Canine Glad and Purr: The Science of Making Your Cat Glad. She is the creator
of the favored weblog, Companion Animal Psychology, and in addition has a column
at Psychology Right now. Todd lives in Maple Ridge, BC, along with her husband,
one canine, and one cat. 

Fb  Instagram  Substack

As an Amazon Affiliate I earn from
qualifying purchases. As an Etsy affiliate and Marks and Spencer
affiliate, I earn from qualifying purchases.